[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 15:46:14 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: 1.8 jumbo1 (steps needed)
On 5 Jun, 2013, at 10:00 , Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> wrote:
> On 06/04/2013 07:52 PM, magnum wrote:
>> On 4 Jun, 2013, at 14:27 , "jfoug" <jfoug@....net> wrote:
>>> Are we going to target pushing unstable out first? If so, what needs to be done, beyond rebasing it on the 1.8?
>>
>> Unstable is to be released as 1.7.9-jumbo-8 (mostly for reference, it could be a pretty silent release) - or not released at all.
>
> If 1.7.9-jumbo-8 and 1.8.x-jumbo-1 are to be released at the same time,
> then may be just tag the latest unstable commit as 1.7.9-jumbo-8 right
> now, an release it officially together with the first jumbo based on 1.8.
But we might end up with bug fixes for Jumbo-1 that applies to unstable too (I'm not picturing curious crashes from rigged input data but worse bugs with proper input).
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
