Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 18:37:29 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Incremental mode in 184.108.40.206 On 19 May, 2013, at 18:22 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 10:04:12PM +0200, Simon Marechal wrote: >> This might be controversial, but I believe that "early" efficiency is >> meaningless for that kind of generator. Every sane person will run some >> kind of dictionary based attack before resorting to incremental. >> >> I will run tests comparing all versions against my "hard" list of >> plaintexts to check this use case. > > I think the "early" efficiency is not meaningless, but is in fact less > important than efficiency on relatively stronger passwords (after having > the weakest ones cracked by other means). > > Luckily, your test results (provided off-list) indicate that the new > code (the latest patch) performs well on your "hard" passwords as well. How do we define "early"? Guessing something after 20 biljon tries is a couple of hours for raw-md5 but 300 years for pbkdf2-hmac-sha512 :-) magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.