Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 07:16:29 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Core: build warning On 6 May, 2013, at 2:47 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 08:15:11PM +0200, magnum wrote: >> inc.c: In function ?do_incremental_crack?: >> inc.c:478: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type > > Yes, I had expected that we'd get this sort of warnings, and I was > surprised I was not getting any of them. I still don't know why not. > For me, gcc silently omits the "offending" check from generated code. Fwiw I got it from clang, gcc 4.7 & 4.8 are silent here too. as well as llvm-gcc iirc. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.