[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <271d8d12a33480a1bb6e3996fc7425d3@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:41:45 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: --fork
On 30 Apr, 2013, at 16:33 , magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
> I will unify some MPI/fork-code (prefering core stuff over the old HAVE_MPI stuff when at all possible).
>
> My goal is to have MPI and -fork so very similar that a forked run can be resumed with MPI, or vice versa. The contest branch was almost there.
Speaking of that, I have plenty of these in bleeding:
+#if HAVE_MPI
+ if (mpi_id == 1)
+#endif
printf("Something (often with unchanged indentation)");
In contest, I had a global variable 'options.rootnode' that was used instead, not ifdef'ed MPI but also valid for node/fork.
-#if HAVE_MPI
- if (mpi_id == 1)
-#endif
+ if (options.root_node)
printf("Something...
Will you do something like that in code? If so, I'll just drop my MPI stuff.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
