Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:27:07 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: formats that duplicate dynamics On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:24:05AM +0400, Alexander Cherepanov wrote: > On 2013-01-27 06:35, Solar Designer wrote: > >The "postgre" format at the very least needs to be renamed from the > >ridiculous "postgre" to "postgres". This includes the filename, > >FORMAT_LABEL, and the "$postgre$" prefix string. > > BTW is postgres is even a good name for it? Isn't it better to leave it > for plain postgresql hashes and net-postgres (or something) for > PostgreSQL MD5 challenge-response. But maybe it's too late to change it... You may be right, or maybe we don't need a separate format for this since it's implementable as a dynamic format (and might match an already defined one, even). What are "plain postgresql hashes", though? Are we supporting them now, and under what name? Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.