Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:09:22 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Segfaults probably caused by DEBUG code in memory.c This doesn't solve the other issue I just posted. magnum On 17 Apr, 2013, at 1:05 , "jfoug" <jfoug@....net> wrote: > I simply removed the memory.h constant. I still allocate the same amount, just not using the 'private' constant from memory > > Jim. > > From: jfoug Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 17:59 >> I will change how dynamic allocates the salt list data. It should not be using a 'private' item from memory.h >> >> From: Frank Dittrich Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 17:23 >>> My fault: >>> >>> dynamic_fmt.c:1800: pSaltDataBuf = pNextSaltDataBuf = mem_alloc_tiny(MEM_ALLOC_SIZE*6, MEM_ALIGN_NON >>> dynamic_fmt.c:1801: nSaltDataBuf = MEM_ALLOC_SIZE*6; >>> >>> I should have checked the usage of MEM_ALLOC_SIZE before suggesting the change. > <JtR_Bleeding_Dynamic_MEM_ALLOC_SIZE.patch>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.