Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 02:32:06 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Building unstable jumbo failed On 21 Mar, 2013, at 2:28 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:32:54AM +0100, Frank Dittrich wrote: >> What about using ($CC) instead of gcc and defining CPLUSPLUS in the >> Makefile, instead of hard coding g++ when building *2john tools? >> Something like the attached patch? > > Yes, but let's use the canonical name of CXX for this make variable. I'll fix this. > (Ideally, we'd avoid this dependency on C++, though.) To ease on the requirement for g++, we could drop gpg2john from the general targets so you'd have to "make gpg2john" to build it separately. That is how we treat things that require pcap, I think (if not, I guess we should). Or perhaps even try to build all of those automatically, but only after finishing John. That way if you lack g++, gpg2john would fail but you'd end up having John. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.