Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:09:43 -0300
From: Claudio André <>

Em 18-03-2013 15:05, magnum escreveu:
>> Hi, if you are having problems looking at previous patches (above), i attach a new one (easier to deal but might harder to follow/understand).
>> commit (7ac5b370) and i'm not sure if it is the right thing to do.
> Do you mean the FMT_SPLIT_UNIFIES_CASE? That flag should be set if (and only if) your format has a split() that returns the ciphertext with case unified (to lower or upper, I think we normally use lower). So the raw format with hex encoding could/should unify case while the Cisco version must not do that (since it would ruin the base64).
> The reason for unifying is so John can recognize that a hex hash of DEAD3137CAFE is cracked even though the pot file has it as dead3137cafe.
> magnum

Magnum, I'm not using it inside Cisco, only on raw. In order to 
understand why I have doubts, take a look at the attached file. All of 
them have a proper split().

Ok, I know, my name is also in the list.

Thanks for the clarification.

View attachment "ver" of type "text/plain" (2374 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.