Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 21:09:40 +0530 From: Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Cisco - Password type 4 - SHA256 On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 6:49 PM, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: > Is this ready for committing to bleeding? Perhaps we should even include it (as well as the CPU format) in Jumbo-8? I am currently *not* in favour of introducing new format(s) for cracking Cisco "type 4" hashes (future code maintenance problems?). I think that existing format(s) and the new cisco2john.pl utility are enough for cracking Cisco "type 4" hashes. cisco2john.pl can be found at https://github.com/kholia/JohnTheRipper/blob/cisco-type-4/run/cisco2john.pl magnum, Do you think that introducing new specific format(s) has any advantages over this mentioned approach? -- Dhiru
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.