Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 21:09:40 +0530
From: Dhiru Kholia <>
Subject: Re: Cisco - Password type 4 - SHA256

On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 6:49 PM, magnum <> wrote:
> Is this ready for committing to bleeding? Perhaps we should even include it (as well as the CPU format) in Jumbo-8?

I am currently *not* in favour of introducing new format(s) for
cracking Cisco "type 4" hashes (future code maintenance problems?).

I think that existing format(s) and the new utility are
enough for cracking Cisco "type 4" hashes. can be found at


Do you think that introducing new specific format(s) has any
advantages over this mentioned approach?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.