[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 14:19:55 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Cisco - Password type 4 - SHA256
On 17 Mar, 2013, at 11:22 , Claudio André <claudioandre.br@...il.com> wrote:
> While at it, please consider giving advices (also) to:
> - https://github.com/claudioandre/JohnTheRipper/commit/c58597e1be8d88d5002c4bfb8aa00a49bfe2c745
> - https://github.com/claudioandre/JohnTheRipper/commit/6d10106e7b0924838411467337507a7746142f12
>
> Thanks.
> ---
>
> $ ../run/john -fo:cisco4 -t=5
> Benchmarking: Cisco "type 4" hashes SHA-256 [32/64 OpenSSL]... DONE
> Raw: 2438K c/s real, 2442K c/s virtual
>
> $ ../run/john -fo:cisco4-opencl -t=5
> Device 0: Juniper (AMD Radeon HD 6700 Series)
> Local worksize (LWS) 128, global worksize (GWS) 1310720
> Benchmarking: Cisco "type 4" hashes SHA-256 [OpenCL (inefficient, development use mostly)]... DONE
> Raw: 13559K c/s real, 45621K c/s virtual
>
> $ ../run/john -fo:raw-sha256 -t=5
> Benchmarking: Raw SHA-256 [32/64 OpenSSL]... DONE
> Raw: 2763K c/s real, 2768K c/s virtual
>
> $ ../run/john -fo:raw-sha256-opencl -t=5
> Device 0: Juniper (AMD Radeon HD 6700 Series)
> Local worksize (LWS) 128, global worksize (GWS) 1310720
> Benchmarking: Raw SHA-256 (pwlen < 32) [OpenCL (inefficient, development use mostly)]... DONE
> Raw: 13648K c/s real, 46131K c/s virtual
Is this ready for committing to bleeding? Perhaps we should even include it (as well as the CPU format) in Jumbo-8?
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
