Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:21:00 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: formats that duplicate dynamics On 15 Mar, 2013, at 18:32 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 09:36:55AM +0100, magnum wrote: >> Since a patch is already submitted/accepted to Ettercap, IMO we should just change the filename and format label but leave the tag alone. Changing the tag is not that important. You may picture 'postgre$' as leetspeak :-) > > I think we should support both $postgre$ and $postgres$ then, with the > latter being recommended for use in other tools, etc. I can't see how a tag name can bother you that much? It's just a file magic, and there is no risk for clashing. You normally neither write it nor look at it: You produce the infile with Ettercap, throw it at John and view the results with -show. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.