Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 06:15:56 -0600 From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net> To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: RE: bug report I use backtrac 5r3 both 64 and 32 using VirtualBox (almost the same as VMware). *** Be sure that Ivan has performed: apt-get update & apt-get upgrade I just checked, and my openssl version is 0.9.8k on 32 bit (my 64 bit VM is on another machine I cannot access right now) One thing to keep in mind, the build using: make linux-x86-sse2i is faster than linux-x86-sse2. I just checked builds from a fresh pull of unstable, using both the linux-x86-sse2i and linux-x86-sse2 targets, and all 197 formats tested just fine Jim. >From: Lukas Odzioba [mailto:lukas.odzioba@...il.com] > >2013/3/3 magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>: >> My 32-bit OSX builds with native OpenSSL are "90812f" whatever that means (0.9.8r?). Can't reproduce it here. >> >> I know Jim used backtrack 32-bit and 64-bit when he wrote the SSE support for wpapsk. The 32-bit was likely the same backtrack version as OP used. He had no problems! > >Ivan used vmware maybe that is related to problem somehow... >I wasn't able to help him on irc with this so I asked to send this to john-dev. > >Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.