Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 06:15:56 -0600
From: "jfoug" <>
To: <>
Subject: RE: bug report

I use backtrac 5r3 both 64 and 32 using VirtualBox (almost the same as

*** Be sure that Ivan has performed:  apt-get update & apt-get upgrade

I just checked, and my openssl version is 0.9.8k on 32 bit (my 64 bit VM is
on another machine I cannot access right now)

One thing to keep in mind, the build using: make linux-x86-sse2i  is faster
than linux-x86-sse2.

I just checked builds from a fresh pull of unstable, using both the
linux-x86-sse2i and linux-x86-sse2 targets, and all 197 formats tested just


>From: Lukas Odzioba [] 
>2013/3/3 magnum <>:
>> My 32-bit OSX builds with native OpenSSL are "90812f" whatever that means
(0.9.8r?). Can't reproduce it here.
>> I know Jim used backtrack 32-bit and 64-bit when he wrote the SSE support
for wpapsk. The 32-bit was likely the same backtrack version as OP used. He
had no problems!
>Ivan used vmware maybe that is related to problem somehow...
>I wasn't able to help him on irc with this so I asked to send this to

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.