Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 22:34:06 -0500
From:  <>
Cc: magnum <>
Subject: Re: formats failing test on big-endian

If this part of the self test is not done:

+		lengthcheck = 2;
		if (lengthcheck == 0 && max == 1) {
			lengthcheck = 2;

then dyna_17 works on BE system.  I am not sure the reason why, but something is certainly not right.  I will keep looking.  I know the above 'fix' is not right.  But it does show the format is working.  It must be something like clear_keys not being properly used for phpass, or something like that.  phpass within dyna IS a 'special' format, so there may be newer features that are not properly set.

Kinda hard right now for me to code much. I cut about 3mm of the tip of my middle finger last night.  Kinda hard to type right now, lol.


---- wrote: 
> ---- magnum <> wrote: 
> > Benchmarking: dynamic_17: phpass ($P$ or $H$) [32/32 X2  (MD5_body)]... FAILED (get_hash[0](1))
> > 
> > The dynamic_17 is strange. Hopefully Jim could have a look at that. I believe all others may be failing due to one same bug, they are all pbkdf2-hmac-sha1. But I haven't nailed it. At first I assumed the iteration count would be wrong for BE but that is not the case, it's done right.
> I thought dyna-17 worked at one time.  looking at code, it appears that the binary_64 may be leaving the bin in BE format, but bottom of the crypt_phpass puts things in LE.  but like I said, if it worked before, it worked with the code this way, so this may not be the problem.  i may not have access to a BE sys right now

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.