Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 20:13:06 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: NTLMv1 and MSCHAPv2 On 6 Feb, 2013, at 15:03 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 08:24:40PM +0100, magnum wrote: >> Sure thing, somehow I misread what you wrote. This is now fixed, threshold is 100 c/r pairs and this is printed: >> >> >> netntlm: Note: slow loading. For short runs, try netntlm-naive instead (using >> --format=netntlm-naive). That version loads faster but runs slower. >> >> >> MSCHAPv2 got the same fixes too. > > Great. Now should we adjust the format_name or algorithm_name for the > naive formats to indicate that they're naive (and different from the > newly sped up ones)? I think we should. Any specific suggestions? I think we should use algorithm_name, as in [32/32 naive]. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.