Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 20:13:06 +0100
From: magnum <>
Subject: Re: NTLMv1 and MSCHAPv2

On 6 Feb, 2013, at 15:03 , Solar Designer <> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 08:24:40PM +0100, magnum wrote:
>> Sure thing, somehow I misread what you wrote. This is now fixed, threshold is 100 c/r pairs and this is printed:
>> netntlm: Note: slow loading. For short runs, try netntlm-naive instead (using
>> --format=netntlm-naive). That version loads faster but runs slower.
>> MSCHAPv2 got the same fixes too.
> Great.  Now should we adjust the format_name or algorithm_name for the
> naive formats to indicate that they're naive (and different from the
> newly sped up ones)?  I think we should.  Any specific suggestions?

I think we should use algorithm_name, as in [32/32 naive].


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.