Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 18:37:47 +0530 From: Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: sshng2john patch On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:28 PM, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: > On 01/26/2013 01:50 PM, Dhiru Kholia wrote: >>> Great, please drop that warning and commit it to both branches. >> >> >> Can't we just mute the warning for now? > > > Is that not what I suggested? I re-read what you said and it answers my question. >> Majority of code in sshng2john.py will become unused after this >> feature is removed. I am a bit nervous pushing such a big change ATM. >> > I'm not sure what you mean. Just commit this patch and mute the warning. > That should be fine. I meant to say that lot of code in sshng2john.py is no longer useful (BER decoding, trial decryption, etc). All this code can be removed at some future point. For now, I will commit this patch and mute the warning as you suggested. Thanks! -- Dhiru
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.