Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 10:00:10 +0530 From: Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: BLAKE2 (was: New plugin load order magic) On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:15:05AM +0530, Dhiru Kholia wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: >> > Then, Dhiru included the slow reference implementation of BLAKE2b >> > instead of the SIMD implementations. I think we should include all SIMD >> > implementations that are available from BLAKE2 team, plus the reference >> > implementations for non-x86 and for older x86 CPUs. > >> Speed is not that bad on 64-bit machines. > > Yes. It's similar to SHA-512's, but it is supposed to be better (with > SIMD code). Speed using XOP on FX-8120. There is lot of improvement but I was expecting more. $ ../run/john -fo:raw-blake2-512 -t Benchmarking: BLAKE2 512 [32/64]... DONE Raw: 3268K c/s real, 3268K c/s virtual -- Dhiru
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.