Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:17:53 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: raw-md5-opencl hash type tag On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:22:08AM +0100, magnum wrote: > On 12 Dec, 2012, at 0:03 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > > It is in fact weird that raw-md5-opencl uses a different hash type tag. > > Perhaps we should make it use $dynamic_0$? Or make the latter use $MD5$? > > This is a bug. I had no idea. Although I regret we ever started using dynamic tags for non-dynamic formats - it should be the other way round. Agreed. > The easiest fix is to switch to $dynamic_0$ in the OpenCL format. Though I'd rather switch to $MD5$ in the others. We could even make the formats understand both but produce any new lines with $MD5$... although such things tend to get messy. And the dynamic format would need to be fixed by Jim, whom I haven't heard from in quite a while now. I'll leave making the determination to you and Jim. > Regardless, we could include a script that converts a user's old .pot file after he upgraded, and remove any dupes while at it. Of course, renaming the old one unaltered to john.pot.bak. This is a last resort approach. I dislike it. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.