Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:46:11 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Warnings for an old OpenSSL On 12 Dec, 2012, at 13:50 , Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com> wrote: > What do you think about generating warnings about disabled formats during build. > Are there any chances that someone will read that? Probably not, unless they build with >/dev/null, or the -s option to make which is essentially the same thing. We could recommend this. I'm not sure non-gnu make will understand -s, does anyone know? We should also try to get rid of as many other warnings as possible. Late gcc complains about a bunch of new stuff. It's a bit down on my to-do list to try to get rid of them (and anyone else wanting to do a few is very welcome). > Yesterday someone on our irc channel had problem with truecrypt and > openssl 1.0.0 > The best way would be generate one big info at the end of compilation > instead of mixing those with other warnings, but this would require > changes in Makefile I think. I'm not sure what we could do that would be better than -s. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.