Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 13:08:47 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: rc4-hmac parsing support + etype 17 + input format unification (Was: Re: [john-users] support for weak kerberos etypes) On 8 Dec, 2012, at 5:43 , Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com> wrote: >> If we decide to drop "salt type" field, then how are you planning to >> parse the "ciphertext"? strtok will jump to next field (user) >> automatically. "salt type" field is helping us know if we have M$ AD >> style salt available. >> >> Always figuring out user and realm fields is not easy (at least with >> the current parser) when M$ AD is involved. > > For now, I have kept the "salt type" field. We leave unknown/unused fields empty, ie. ...$$... - I don't see the problem? > Done in commit 6aa836b442c2b089d9850e3be31fdba03507102f Great, I'll pick up from there. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.