Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 23:59:23 +0400 From: Alexander Cherepanov <cherepan@...me.ru> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Static analysis of John using Coverity On 2012-09-14 03:14, Solar Designer wrote: > Jumbo's code quality is too low. (The core tree's could be > improved as well, to be fair.) Well, maybe some of the positives will > make us identify and patch specific bugs... while keeping the overall > quality almost as low. Do you have in mind some specific directions in which jumbo could be improved? Wish-list wiki page mostly lists desired features, maybe it's worth to make a list of wishes regarding code quality. BTW do you have any plans regarding integrating parts of the jumbo into the core? I'm curious... -- Alexander Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.