[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 03:58:25 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: bitslice DES on GPU
Hi Sayantan,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:12:54PM +0530, Sayantan Datta wrote:
> Benchmarking: DES BS [128/128 BS XOP-16]... DONE
BTW, the "DES BS [128/128 BS XOP-16]" comment is wrong. It should be
something like "Traditional DES [OpenCL]", to be consistent with other
format and algorithm names that we currently use (and to exclude the
irrelevant CPU build info).
(The "Traditional DES" portion may be replaced with "descrypt" in 1.8,
but that's another matter.)
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
