Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:53:41 +0400 From: Aleksey Cherepanov <aleksey.4erepanov@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Aleksey's daily status report #13 On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:42:02AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > Aleksey, Frank - > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 03:14:51AM +0400, Aleksey Cherepanov wrote: > > For two days... > > > > Done > > > > - .debs are finished > > - .rpms are finished > > Ugh... %-) > > This would be good if it were true It is true ;-) > , but from what you wrote below you're > merely repackaging previously built binaries. Frank - did you approve > this sort of thing (and I missed it)? > > Do the resulting packages have proper dependencies on the libraries? > For example, what happens when you try to install them on a system > without Qt installed? Everything is ok. My checklist was: - dependencies (needs qt and john, and does not need anything else) - permissions, uid, gud on installed files - place of license file Previously I tested binaries separately looking for: - problems with appearance - path to john and its auto detection - need of qt installation, its version and so on My .debs and .rpms are good. Though .rpm dependency on qt does not insist on certain version (just 4.*). So there could be problems with qt older than 4.6. But among tested systems I did not see such. Thanks! -- Regards, Aleksey Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.