Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:35:52 +0200 From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Aleksey's daily status report #13 On 08/20/2012 07:42 AM, Solar Designer wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 03:14:51AM +0400, Aleksey Cherepanov wrote: >> For two days... >> >> Done >> >> - .debs are finished >> - .rpms are finished >> Ugh... %-) > > This would be good if it were true, but from what you wrote below you're > merely repackaging previously built binaries. Frank - did you approve > this sort of thing (and I missed it)? I didn't actually approve anything, nor did I disapprove. > Do the resulting packages have proper dependencies on the libraries? > For example, what happens when you try to install them on a system > without Qt installed? I also thought about dependencies, but: While qt development packages (for building johnny) where not part of the default fedora installation, qt was already installed, probably due to a lot of other packages depending on it. I agree that the packages should provide proper dependencies (which might be hard because each distribution seems to name the required packages differently), but in practice I doubt that any GUI user will have a problem with missing packages. Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.