Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 19:16:13 +0400 From: Aleksey Cherepanov <aleksey.4erepanov@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Aleksey's daily status report #13 On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:48:49AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > Aleksey, Frank - > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:42:02AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 03:14:51AM +0400, Aleksey Cherepanov wrote: > > > - .debs are finished > > > - .rpms are finished > > > Ugh... %-) > > > > This would be good if it were true, but from what you wrote below you're > > merely repackaging previously built binaries. Frank - did you approve > > this sort of thing (and I missed it)? > > > > Do the resulting packages have proper dependencies on the libraries? > > Well, I guess they do, since the way at least RPM handles this does not > in any way depend on the actual build from source being done. I'm not > familiar with building .deb's and I haven't seen how you do it, though. > So my question above applies to the .deb's only - for the .rpm's I know > the answer. My .debs have explicit dependency on libqtgui4 of version 4.6.0 or higher. (Much) older debian-based distros may refer this library as libqt4-gui (exclusively) but I did not care about it. > Anyhow, not building from source during package build feels wrong to me. To me too but it has its own advantages (explained in other mail). Thanks! -- Regards, Aleksey Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.