Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 12:06:59 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: int crypt_all(count, salt) On 2012-07-21 15:27, Solar Designer wrote: > As discussed on IRC yesterday, attached is a patch that implements "int > *count", but not set_mask() yet. As discussed, for your initial > ... > I've attached two files implementing the same changes: > > john-220.127.116.11-crypt_all-pcount-1.diff - applies on top of clean 18.104.22.168 > as found in CVS. This patch includes everything new, right? Should I merge this into bleeding? I thought they were going into CVS soon so I waited (because it will be better for future git history) but it's still not in. Also, I should bump FMT_MAIN_VERSION to 11, right? It would make it easier to do version-independant formats. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.