Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:02:45 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: int crypt_all(count, salt) On 2012-08-19 17:11, Solar Designer wrote: > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:06:59PM +0200, magnum wrote: >> On 2012-07-21 15:27, Solar Designer wrote: >>> john-22.214.171.124-crypt_all-pcount-1.diff - applies on top of clean 126.96.36.199 >>> as found in CVS. >> >> This patch includes everything new, right? > > Yes, it has everything that I prepared for myrice's experiments so far. > >> Should I merge this into >> bleeding? I thought they were going into CVS soon so I waited (because >> it will be better for future git history) but it's still not in. > > I think I'll get something like this into CVS eventually - I'm not sure > how soon that will be. Do you want to have this in bleeding, even > though you'll need to replace it with whatever gets committed to CVS > later? Maybe not. I'm mostly curious about done() and the faster self-test right now. > FYI, I expect that myrice will take a short break, so having > this in bleeding won't be helping the project yet. Now, in case we want > to merge the PG-test stuff into bleeding, we'll definitely need these > changes in bleeding first. But do we want this stuff in there, with the > hard-coded appended chars? Not unless it helps someone. I think I'll just have a look at it in a scratch branch. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.