Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:09:24 -0500 From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net> To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: RE: SRP This protocol is trivially explained in http://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/xypw2/blizzard_security_update/c5qx7 70 Piece of cake to implement. The bottleneck will be in the GMP expmod speeds. But with N being only 256 bits, the expmod is very fast (but much slower than SHA1). I used to do a lot of work with GMP (and some other fast exponentators), when I was coding on OpenPFGW. For 256 bit size, and N being a 'non-special' number, GMP is about as fast it gets, for general purpose. Any chance of finding the leaked s, u, v data, to know if a format would be working properly? Jim. >From: Solar Designer [mailto:solar@...nwall.com] > >Hi, > >Here's our opportunity to start supporting SRP verifiers: > >http://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/xypw2/blizzard_security_update/c5qx 770 > >Anyone?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.