Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 20:23:41 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: wpapsk error report On 2012-08-02 19:57, Frank Dittrich wrote: > On 08/02/2012 06:40 PM, Lukas Odzioba wrote: >> Some time ago I got the following error report for wpapsk-cuda format. >> Has anyone have access to similar gpu (GeForce 8600GT) and can try >> reproduce this bug for the latest and this: b6b881d magnum jumbo >> version? > > I don't, but: > Would it help to include CUDA / OpenCL specific version info into > --list=build-info? > > Is there also a run-time version which can differ from built info? There's even the issue that you can have eg. OpenCL 1.2 compatible *drivers* at run-time but some or all of your *devices* are OpenCL 1.1 or 1.0. This can currently be seen with --list=opencl-devices. For example, any card not physically capable of byte-addressed stores will never get better than OpenCL 1.0 regardless of driver updates (well unless they work around it in software, but there's no chance they would do that for an old card). > And is there a way to include driver version in run-time-info? You could re-use some of the --list=(cuda|opencl)-devices code and put this stuff into --list=build-info if you want to, but I would personally not bother. I do not object either, but we should try to use shared functions eg. in opencl-common.c so future fixes don't have to be applied to several places. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.