Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 21:52:03 +0800 From: myrice <qqlddg@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: int crypt_all(count, salt) On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > myrice - > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:10:41PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: >> BTW, how did you locate the hashes corresponding to the current salt on >> GPU in your existing (now lost?) implementation of loaded hashes? Did >> you possibly implement some hash table lookups by salt value? Or do you >> assume that crypt_all() is called for all salts sequentially (in the >> same order they were seen before)? (This might be risky.) > > I think you never replied to the above. Please do. > In my previous implementation. I suppose the latter case you said. I am going to implement hash table by salt value or either add salt_id as you said. Thanks myrice
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.