Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:02:23 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Fixes for --list=format-details and --list=format-all-details

The first patch re-introduces a fix that had already been committed to
bleeding-jumbo, magnum-jumbo and 1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes (commit
a96222f03eb153ae56d8480ca243e4d5d07b7a5e), but got reverted by accident
with commit 61cea42f979eb07284afc099550f90ae50bb858a.

It fixes the output of salt size in --list=format-details for dynamic
formats.
Without this fix --list=format-details will print the size of a pointer
instead of the real salt size used by the dynamic format.

So, the first patch needs to be applied to all tries:
bleeding-jumbo, magnum-jumbo and 1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes, as well as to the
contest edition.

The second patch is just for bleeding-jumbo, but it requires that the
first patch is applied.
It adds the binary_align and salt_align information (recently added to
bleeding-jumbo) to the --list=format-details and
--list=format-all-details output.

These patches are not very intrusive and rather trivial. That's why I
only tested them on linux-x86.

Frank

View attachment "0001-Fix-salt-size-of-dynamic-formats-in-list-format-deta.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (3135 bytes)

View attachment "0002-Add-binary-and-salt-alignment-to-list-format-all-det.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2033 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.