Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:11:27 +0800 From: myrice <qqlddg@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: xsha512-cuda & xsha512-opencl testing On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > myrice - > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 02:29:40PM +0800, myrice wrote: >> HashNum_SaltNum >> 1_1 >> guesses: 1 time: 0:00:00:01 DONE (Sun Jul 15 12:09:50 2012) c/s: 499321 >> >> 100_100 >> guesses: 100 time: 0:00:00:01 DONE (Sun Jul 15 18:18:18 2012) c/s: 26346K > > 1 second is too little time for the c/s rate to reflect anything. > (1 minute could be OK.) > It seems my password are so "simple". Even in incremental mode, it finished very fast. I have to choose a long and difficult password for such small test case. >> 1M_K >> guesses: 1000000 time: 0:00:10:14 DONE (Sun Jul 15 20:30:56 2012) c/s: 1260M1M > > Running time is OK, but the hashes/salt ratio was changing, and > non-negligible time might have been spent on processing the successful > guesses. > > Also, what's "1260M1M" - doesn't look like a number to me. Is this what > john actually printed? I doubt it. > My mistake. It should be 1260M without 1M...(1M is the next line word) I will post incremental result soon Thanks myrice
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.