Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:22:30 -0500 From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net> To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: RE: prepare() and source() are in CVS >From: Solar Designer [mailto:solar@...nwall.com] > >Jim, magnum, all - > >I've committed my changes introducing prepare() and source() format >methods to CVS. This is John version 184.108.40.206, which only exists as part >of Owl-current right now. Would have been nice to wait for a little peer review on this, but that's your call. >Please merge these into bleeding. > >I intend to proceed experimenting with further formats interface >changes, but I wanted to eliminate these differences between core and >jumbo first. > >Some of my further changes may be relevant to myrice's work on >offloading hash comparisons and candidate password generation to GPU. >Talking to myrice yesterday, I suggested basing such experimental trees >on bleeding. Since my further changes will initially be for core rather >than bleeding, it might help myrice if bleeding's formats interface is >more similar to core's. I have followed along on some of these interface changes, and many seem very good. Others, I simply do not know the 'why' or behind the scene need, so I will simply watch them being used. >BTW, bleeding currently lacks source() for LM hashes (I guess since this >was a bit non-trivial to implement, requiring DES final permutation), That was exactly why. LM would have been good, since there are some larger lists, but I was uncomfortable with the complexity needed. >so >merging the changes from core (which include this) will also be an >improvement for bleeding. Agreed. Jim.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.