Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:09:43 +0200 From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: Aleksey's status report #10 On 07/10/2012 07:56 AM, Aleksey Cherepanov wrote: > On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 11:57:53AM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote: >> On 06/27/2012 02:55 PM, Frank Dittrich wrote: >>> For other section names, you might even need to implement new >>> functionality to john, like listing the contents of a section (with >>> include statements for sections or file names being resolved). >>> Or at least functionality to get the value of a certain variable from a >>> config section, so that you can parse >>> >>> File = $JOHN/my.chr >>> >>> and know which file is needed for that attack. >> >> It gets even more complicated, because default for --incremental is All, >> except when you are cracking LM DES hashes. >> For lm, the default is LanMan -> lanman.chr >> (But we can also just assume that lanman.chr exists on all the clients. > > If we assume that .chr file(s) exists on all clients than we should > check that it is the original file. OK. >>>From my point of view as a user it seems natural to replace original > file with newly generated and probably adjust config a bit instead of > adding a new section. I think many users don't create new .chr files. When I do, I always use new file names and new sections. Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.