[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:16:42 -0500
From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net>
To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: plans for 1.7.9-jumbo-7, new formats interface, 1.8
Speaking of Radmin, I get this when running under VC, in debug mode (has
stack checking on by default). (-test=0)
Benchmarking: RAdmin v2.x MD5 [32/32]...
(0) : Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'input' was
corrupted.
(0) : Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'ctx' was
corrupted.
(0) : Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'input' was
corrupted.
(0) : Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'ctx' was
corrupted.
(0) : Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'input' was
corrupted.
(0) : Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'ctx' was
corrupted.
(0) : Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'input' was
corrupted.
(0) : Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'ctx' was
corrupted.
(0) : Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'input' was
corrupted.
(0) : Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'ctx' was
corrupted.
(0) : Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'input' was
corrupted.
(0) : Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'ctx' was
corrupted.
(0) : Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'input' was
corrupted.
(0) : Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'ctx' was
corrupted.
DONE
Raw: 4294M c/s
So somewhere, we have some memory issues. When I run a -test=1 -form=radmin
I get a ton more of those messages. From the 2 vars, it looks like
something in crypt_all.
One other big issue I see here, is when you allocate crypt_out, it MUST be
done MEM_ALIGN_WORD. You later access this as a ARCH_WORD_32. On systems
that do not allow unaligned access (sparc for one), it will core.
Jim.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dhiru Kholia [mailto:dhiru.kholia@...il.com]
>Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 10:31 PM
>To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
>Subject: Re: [john-dev] plans for 1.7.9-jumbo-7, new formats interface,
>1.8
>
>On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:19 AM, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2012-07-03 01:08, Solar Designer wrote:
>>> I think that it would be good for us to release a 1.7.9-jumbo-7 with
>>> little more than bugfixes for issues found in -6, in 1-2 weeks from
>now.
>>
>> We have kept all the hazard stuff in bleeding-jumbo. I think Dhiru
>> added one or two formats. Dhiru, are these safe for old versions of
>> OpenSSL and so on?
>
>Radmin format shoule be safe for old version of OpenSSL and hence it not
>a plug-un. pfx format is not a plug-in and has a check for old version
>of OpenSSL (someone needs to test it though).
>
>Both can go in jumbo-7. No problems.
>
>> We'll just use bleeding for the crazy stuff for now, and start a third
>> branch only if/when needed. Dhiru, please confirm: From now on push to
>> bleeding if you are unsure, or consult the lists.
>
>Okay, I won't have any more patches for a while.
>
>--
>Cheers,
>Dhiru
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
