Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 01:59:34 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: Re: asan report On 2012-06-30 13:09, Tavis Ormandy wrote: >>> In fact, I was going to suggest adding a flag that guarantees it will be >>> 16-byte aligned so I can use MOVDQA. >> >> I've had such thoughts too. But I'm not sure how we'd handle wordlist >> buffer mode (which is a huge speedup). We'll need to think it over. >> > > OK, sounds good to me. BTW you still advertise a BINARY_SIZE of 20 octets although you would do perfectly fine with 4. The difference is very far from neglectable if you load a couple of million hashes. I *really* think this should be your #1 goal and it's a walk in the park. Take a look at a late rawSHA1_fmt_plug.c and look for BINARY_SIZE vs DIGEST_SIZE. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.