Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 23:44:11 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: SHA2 added to bleeding On 2012-06-30 22:48, jfoug@....net wrote: > ---- jfoug <jfoug@....net> wrote: >> I have added sha2.c and sha2.h and modified a lot of formats, to remove the >> oSSL version dependency for SHA224/256/384/512 from JtR. >> > > Here are some quick and dirty 'speed' tests: > > > Speed tests for new JtR sha2.c code (generic vs oSSL) > All tests on: AMD Atholon64-3400 dual core, non OMP build. ...and as implemented, this will only kick in if your OpenSSL version does not support SHA-2 at all, so *any* speed is good speed. So obviously I think this is very good stuff. Simon, or Tavis, don't you feel a sudden urge to implement damn good SHA-2 intrinsics into JtR? Actually, we can make this a contest: Which one of you will be first? And which one of you will be best? Maybe we can manage to offer some kind of prices for each of those sub-tasks :-) magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.