Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:36:03 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: raw SHA-512 and XSHA512 CUDA/OpenCL (was: Jumbo-6 release status) myrice - On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 07:19:29PM +0800, myrice wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > > Totally buggy GPU formats (pass self-test, but don't crack any passwords): > > * raw-sha512-cuda > > * raw-sha512-opencl > > * xsha512-cuda > > * xsha512-opencl > > This fixed. This is due to BINARY_SIZE. We have reduced it from 64 to > 8 for efficiency and passed it out. Actually, the 64(FULL_BINARY_SIZE) > should be passed. > > I already sent a pull request to magnum. OK. I am glad that this was easy to fix. Now your task is to figure out why BINARY_SIZE of 8 did not work - or rather, why it worked for the self-tests, but not the rest. And to reduce BINARY_SIZE back to 8 once you figure this out and fix whatever did not support that lower size. This ought to work with 8 (with suitable code). Thanks, Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.