[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:36:03 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: raw SHA-512 and XSHA512 CUDA/OpenCL (was: Jumbo-6 release status)
myrice -
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 07:19:29PM +0800, myrice wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> > Totally buggy GPU formats (pass self-test, but don't crack any passwords):
> > * raw-sha512-cuda
> > * raw-sha512-opencl
> > * xsha512-cuda
> > * xsha512-opencl
>
> This fixed. This is due to BINARY_SIZE. We have reduced it from 64 to
> 8 for efficiency and passed it out. Actually, the 64(FULL_BINARY_SIZE)
> should be passed.
>
> I already sent a pull request to magnum.
OK. I am glad that this was easy to fix. Now your task is to figure
out why BINARY_SIZE of 8 did not work - or rather, why it worked for
the self-tests, but not the rest. And to reduce BINARY_SIZE back to 8
once you figure this out and fix whatever did not support that lower
size. This ought to work with 8 (with suitable code).
Thanks,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
