Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 04:40:57 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Jumbo-6 release status On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 02:29:10AM +0200, magnum wrote: > * Two more formats are as bad or good as the CUDA mscash formats, namely > raw-sha224-cuda and raw-sha256-cuda. Unless they get fixed, we could > give them the same warning label and document it in doc/BUGS. Please add them to doc/BUGS. > * raw-sha512-opencl and raw-sha512-cuda do not seem to crack a single > password. I think we need to move them to unused/ unless fixed. If we > ditch them we should take them out of the "new formats" list in > doc/CHANGES-jumbo too. Please do that. What about xsha512-cuda and xsha512-opencl? Do they work? > * The non-raw SHA2 GPU formats are not yet in Test Suite (Jim is working > on cryptsha256/cryptsha512). We can just hope they do not have similar > problems unless someone actually tested them with files lately. Can you briefly test them now, maybe with some one-liners? > * Frank seem to have found bugs in dynamic for some odd build targets > (clang 32-bit, and MMX). OK. We can release with those. %-( This is jumbo. It is buggy. > * We have about 150 variable declarations not at top of block, all of > them are in GPU formats. I suppose we release them as-is although I hate > the warnings now emitted in bleeding-jumbo because they hide worse > problems. And if I drop the -Wdeclaration-after-statement in bleeding, > no-one will ever fix them. OK. Not a blocker. > Do we have more issues I forgot now? We should have a bug tracker. Yes, we have some more issues. > I'm going to sleep now. Oh, then I am releasing with all that broken stuff... I don't want to postpone this for another week. I want to move on to other stuff. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.