Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:24:58 +0530
From: Dhiru Kholia <>
Subject: Re: clang builds are faster than gcc builds for --format=dominosec

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:27 AM, magnum <> wrote:
> On 2012-06-26 23:53, Frank Dittrich wrote:
>> Finally, an interesting observation...
>> For linux-x86-64. the clang version is more than 30% faster than any gcc
>> build (at least with the gcc 4.6.3 that comes with fedora 16), for 32
>> bit linux-x86, clang builds are even more than 40% faster.
>> A few other formats also profit from a clang build.
> What version of clang is this? I noticed my Ubuntu 12 clang is old
> enough not to support the -faddress-sanitizer

Get Clang 3.1 binaries from
I use Arch Linux and have Clang 3.1 which supports  -faddress-sanitizer flag.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.