[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 03:36:00 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Jumbo candidate vs Test Suite
On 2012-06-26 03:22, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 03:17:10AM +0200, Lukas Odzioba wrote:
>> Current status:
>>
>> form=mscash-cuda guesses: 1216 time: 0:00:00:10 :
>> Expected count(s) (1430) [!!!FAILED!!!]
>> .pot CHK:mscash-cuda guesses: 1216 time: 0:00:00:09 [PASSED]
>> form=mscash2-cuda guesses: 1050 time: 0:00:00:22 :
>> Expected count(s) (1479) [!!!FAILED!!!]
>> .pot CHK:mscash2-cuda guesses: 1050 time: 0:00:00:19 [PASSED]
>>
>> Solution: We're throwing out of jumbo-6 those formats. If they're not
>> working, they're useless.
>
> Can we add " unreliable, may miss guesses" to ALGORITHM_NAME instead?
>
> jumbo is not supposed to be bug-free - it has way too many bugs no
> matter what we do. ;-) So having some (worst) bugs documented makes
> some sense. ;-)
I agree, done and committed.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
