Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 01:37:12 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Some relbench results for linux-x86-sse2 (jumbo5 vs. upcoming jumbo6) Frank, On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:11:09PM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote: > And these are the worst regressions: > $ ./relbench -v j5-sse2-mod.txt j6-sse2.txt|grep "^Ratio:"|cut -f > 2-|sort -n|head -n 10 ... > 0.61111 real, 0.61111 virtual MediaWiki md5($s.'-'.md5($p)):Many salts > 0.87012 real, 0.87891 virtual phpass MD5 ($P$9):Raw ... > 0.88684 real, 0.89589 virtual MySQL:Raw ... > 0.90846 real, 0.90857 virtual dynamic_27: FreeBSD MD5:Raw > 0.91026 real, 0.91026 virtual Generic salted MD4:Many salts > 0.92756 real, 0.92756 virtual dynamic_0: md5($p) (raw-md5):Raw Can you post the actual output for these (for both versions)? Are these regressions fully reproducible if you re-run both versions? What make target did you use? linux-x86-sse2 or linux-x86-sse2i? Can you try the other and see how it differs? Thanks, Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.