Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:57:25 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: relbench and changed format names On 2012-06-22 01:50, Solar Designer wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:59:58AM +0200, magnum wrote: >> Could we not make relbench look at the world in some different way? > > Any specific suggestions? > > I am not aware of a relbench side fix to this that would not introduce a > lot of user-visible complexity/confusion. I think labeling the NT format (in n incarnations) as n different formats will introduce a lot of user confusion. relbench could use the fastest found. But no, I don't have any specific suggestion (unless "relbench could use the fastest found" is a suggestion. Maybe it is). I just really dislike the idea of putting implementation-specific stuff in the format label. They do not belong there. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.