Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:57:25 +0200
From: magnum <>
Subject: Re: relbench and changed format names

On 2012-06-22 01:50, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:59:58AM +0200, magnum wrote:
>> Could we not make relbench look at the world in some different way?
> Any specific suggestions?
> I am not aware of a relbench side fix to this that would not introduce a
> lot of user-visible complexity/confusion.

I think labeling the NT format (in n incarnations) as n different 
formats will introduce a lot of user confusion. relbench could use the 
fastest found.

But no, I don't have any specific suggestion (unless "relbench could use 
the fastest found" is a suggestion. Maybe it is). I just really dislike 
the idea of putting implementation-specific stuff in the format label. 
They do not belong there.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.