Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:14:17 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: relbench and changed format names On 2012-06-22 00:56, Frank Dittrich wrote: > On 06/22/2012 12:49 AM, Solar Designer wrote: >> For MySQL, is there any reason to keep the non-fast implementation in >> the tree at all? If not, then let's move it to unused/ and rename >> mysql-fast to just mysql (and not mention the label then). > > Probably not. > But mysql and mysql-fast use different test vectors, so identifying one > as the other would be cheating ;) True, but mysql-fast is a *lot* faster anyway you put it. I've had thoughts about this for quite some time. Is there a difference in plaintext length? OK, I'll look up the answer... no, both are 32. I think we should do wot Solar said. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.