Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:08:00 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: relbench and changed format names On 2012-06-22 00:04, Frank Dittrich wrote: > On 06/21/2012 04:48 PM, Solar Designer wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:33:25AM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote: >>> Should I also try relbench, and compare the jumbo-5 results with current >>> magnum-jumbo? >> >> You may, but this will fail to compare many of the formats because of >> the renames. > > Yes, I expected such problems, but I think we need to know the impact of > the renames. > >> Maybe you can correct that by preparing a script that >> would do similar renames in output of jumbo-5. > > For now, I just changed relbench in a way that the jumbo-5 dynamic > formats are recognized as the same as those in current git. > This alone increased the number of matching formats by 36. > See attached patch. Cool. Should I commit this? magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.