Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:04:06 +0200 From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: relbench and changed format names (was: 1.7.9-jumbo-6) On 06/21/2012 04:48 PM, Solar Designer wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:33:25AM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote: >> Should I also try relbench, and compare the jumbo-5 results with current >> magnum-jumbo? > > You may, but this will fail to compare many of the formats because of > the renames. Yes, I expected such problems, but I think we need to know the impact of the renames. > Maybe you can correct that by preparing a script that > would do similar renames in output of jumbo-5. For now, I just changed relbench in a way that the jumbo-5 dynamic formats are recognized as the same as those in current git. This alone increased the number of matching formats by 36. See attached patch. > Maybe we can even > include that script along with jumbo-6. In fact, maybe that script > shouldn't be specific to this one occasion, but should be a script to > turn all historical format names to what they're currently called in > whatever revision of jumbo the script is included with. This gets tricky because now some formats that used different format names in jumbo-5 now use the same format name. Frank View attachment "0001-relbench-make-sure-jumbo-5-dynamic-format-names-are-.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1128 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.