[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:05:02 -0500
From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net>
To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: 1.7.9-jumbo-6
>From: Solar Designer [mailto:solar@...nwall.com]
>
>I think we're almost ready to release the current magnum-jumbo as 1.7.9-
>jumbo-6. If you're aware of anything that needs to happen before we
>make this release, please let me know (post to this thread).
EPI and RACF need work.
>Also, now is the time to proceed with testing on lots of platforms.
>For example, I am unsure if my recent changes to ALGORITHM_NAME for sse-
>intrinsics work as intended on 32-bit builds (-any, -mmx, -sse2) - can
>anyone test that, please?
Win32-cygwin-x86-any. Works.
Algo's display correctly
RACF and EPI fail self tests
Win32-cygwin-x86-mmx. Works. (but mmx is almost never a real target these
days anyway)
Dynamic formats: [64/64 SSE2 intrinsics 64x2]. But I thought MMX used the .s
files.
Others show this: Benchmarking: Kerberos AFS DES [48/64 4K MMX].
Benchmarking: HTTP Digest access authentication MD5 [64/64 MMX 2x].
RACF and EPI fail self tests
Win32-cygwin-x86-sse2 (I always use sse2i)
Algo's display correctly
RACF and EPI fail self tests
This one does intrinsics, but compiles the .c file (slower with cygwin's
gcc)
Win32-cygwin-x86-sse2i (Uses ICC's .S build of the intrinsic file, much
faster)
Algo's display correctly
RACF and EPI fail self tests
Jim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
