Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:46:22 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Reduced binary size On 2012-06-18 23:12, jfoug wrote: >> From: magnum [mailto:john.magnum@...hmail.com] >> BTW I'm still using the repairing variant of LI format despite its >> shortcomings. I wonder how much we'd need to hack core to make it behave >> better. > > What exactly were the side effects? If it was that simply the -list was > failing, then just use -form=dynamic_26, or -form=raw-sha1 on the show > command line. I really think the rebuild is the correct way to go. The > hashes are CORRECT in the .pot file. The other way, you end up with > garbage. They list themselves as dyna_26, but are broken. You mean -show. Yes, good points. And if you just do --show with no --format, it will be OK. I'll put that version back in bleeding with some added comments. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.