Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:57:05 +0200 From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [patch] optional new raw sha1 implemetation On 06/17/2012 06:37 PM, Solar Designer wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 06:14:09PM +0200, Tavis Ormandy wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:27:53PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: >>> The format label rawsha1_sse4 should probably be renamed because there's >>> no hard dependency on SSE4.1 anymore. >> >> Sure, any suggestions? > > raw-sha1-ng (we have raw-sha1 for the old one). I understand that currently both formats are necessary to continue experimenting. But since both formats crack the same hashes, the final goal should be to have one format, with proper #ifdefs..., or am I missing something? Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.