Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:57:05 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <>
Subject: Re: [patch] optional new raw sha1 implemetation

On 06/17/2012 06:37 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 06:14:09PM +0200, Tavis Ormandy wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:27:53PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
>>> The format label rawsha1_sse4 should probably be renamed because there's
>>> no hard dependency on SSE4.1 anymore.
>> Sure, any suggestions?
> raw-sha1-ng (we have raw-sha1 for the old one).

I understand that currently both formats are necessary to continue
But since both formats crack the same hashes, the final goal should be
to have one format, with proper #ifdefs..., or am I missing something?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.