Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:54:44 +0200
From: magnum <>
Subject: Re: [patch] optional new raw sha1 implemetation

On 2012-06-17 17:51, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 05:38:01PM +0200, magnum wrote:
>> I built with the -native target so I should have got the same speed as
>> you for Simon's format. But 22600K is the best I get from the
>> fluctuations. Any idea why?
> No.
>> Is an -xop build different in some way?
> It should be the same, but you could want to check the binary.

I checked the code and the behavior of gcc and from what I can see there 
should be absolutely no difference with the #ifdefs so this must be 
something with the gcc optimizer. But we do get a different 
taviso_fmt.o. Maybe I'll dissect them some rainy day.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.