Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:54:44 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [patch] optional new raw sha1 implemetation On 2012-06-17 17:51, Solar Designer wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 05:38:01PM +0200, magnum wrote: >> I built with the -native target so I should have got the same speed as >> you for Simon's format. But 22600K is the best I get from the >> fluctuations. Any idea why? > > No. > >> Is an -xop build different in some way? > > It should be the same, but you could want to check the binary. I checked the code and the behavior of gcc and from what I can see there should be absolutely no difference with the #ifdefs so this must be something with the gcc optimizer. But we do get a different taviso_fmt.o. Maybe I'll dissect them some rainy day. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.