Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 01:28:46 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: [patch] optional new raw sha1 implemetation On 2012-06-17 01:25, Tavis Ormandy wrote: > Regarding switching memrchr to strrchr, I dont think this is correct, > they are strings on input, but I store them in a format that can be > converted to SHA-1 input very quickly and there is no guarantee there > is a nul byte at the end. Yes but we search for 0x80 and this *will* be present. I see no problem, and it works just fine. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.